|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(11/16/2015)
|
| Pity that Mr. Williamson felt he had to "cherry pick" his examples but then failed to recognize there's no incumbency upon the threatened to determine if the weapon used is lethal. Self-defense, or defense of family or others "in extremis" isn't "vigilantism". Perhaps Mr. Williamson can persuade the gang bangers and gun-using drug peddlers/users not to randomly shoot their victims and be content with money. But until that miracle happens, legally armed citizens will continue to defend themselves and theirs with lethal force if its thrust upon them. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| ...If a man lies under oath or procures the lie of another under oath, if he perjures himself or suborns perjury, he is guilty under the statute law. Under the higher law, under the great law of morality and righteousness, he is precisely as guilty if, instead of lying in a court, he lies in a newspaper or on the stump; and in all probability, the evil effects of his conduct are infinitely more widespread and more pernicious. — Teddy Roosevelt - May 12, 1900 |
|
|
