![Keep and Bear Arms](/images/clear.gif)
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MO: City of Arnold sues over Missouri's new gun law
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The city of Arnold this week asked a judge to overturn Missouri's controversial new gun law, saying it is vague and confusing, hampers criminal investigations and is contrary to state and federal law.
In a lawsuit filed in Jefferson County Circuit Court on Wednesday, the city says the "Second Amendment Preservation Act" contains a series of provisions that put city officials at risk, including an apparent prohibition against seizing guns during investigations.
The city also said the law hampers the "recruitment, hiring and retention of law enforcement officers who are currently or formerly employed by or affiliated with" any federal agency. |
Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(1/8/2022)
|
These should be called the waco/ruby ridge prevention acts. Federal goons need to be escorted out of each state if they pretend to be enforcing anything. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/9/2022)
|
Too many in the voter base don't understand that the government has drifted way past its constitutional limitations, and must he reined in. They are the product of decades of conditioning to believe that whatever government decides is 'best' for us is legitimately within its purview; that simply is not true.
The Constitutions of the nation and the several states are constructed to limit government powers to those they specifically delegate to it, and they exist precisely FOR that purpose.
This law is just an example of remedying existing law, legislatively (as should be done).
Our duty isn't to make government's job easier, government's duty is to stay out of our way.
Liberty is paramount. Government is an afterthought. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.— Benjamin Franklin Historical Review of Pennsylvania. [Note: This sentence was often quoted in the Revolutionary period. It occurs even so early as November, 1755, in an answer by the Assembly of Pennsylvania to the Governor, and forms the motto of Franklin's "Historical Review," 1759, appearing also in the body of the work. — Frothingham: Rise of the Republic of the United States, p. 413. ] |
|
|