|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
hisself
(7/6/2016)
|
Starts off with a lie!
Assault weapons may be NOT BE banned without violating the Second Amendment! Why? "These weapons are not commonly used for self-defense in the home." SO WHAT? The Second Amendment has no clauses regarding use in the home, it simply states that the government may NOT infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms. It is MY RIGHT to carry any arm which I can. No exceptions!
Assault weapons bans, machine gun bans, sawed off shotgun bans - ALL UNCONSTITUTIONAL! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/6/2016)
|
M4s are becoming far more popular for home defense, so the ignoramus who wrote it needs to update his information.
It is also true that it doesn't really matter if anyone uses them for defense. I don't think that antigunners really know what "shall not be infringed" really means. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
