
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Union Shooting Range Owner Recognizes Challenges
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It’s the only one of its kind in a 15-mile radius, and RTSP co-owner and chief executive officer Rick Friedman recognizes the challenges that come with operating his shooting range in a state with some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. “I would love to have the freedoms that everyone else enjoys, but I’ll always be a Jersey boy” Friedman, who co-owns the RTSP gun range, told LocalSource on Dec. 13. “I want to change my home and I want my home to recognize the rights of other states instead of running away. If I leave, they win.” |
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(12/24/2018)
|
Apparently the citizenry there, needs to be told that they have "Rights". So, where did these "Elected Officials" get the idea that by showing total disregard for the Constitution will give them "No Limits" on governmental powers? Sounds as if a trail by jury for breaking the Oath of Office, could be the only thing that is going keep these under miners of our Constitutional form of government in line with the "Law of the Land". TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242 |
Comment by:
jac
(12/24/2018)
|
If you leave you win and the state that you move to wins. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|