|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: BU Journalism Student Says Va. Shooting Won’t Deter Him
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Guerra said he thinks a lesson on self-defense should be offered in a journalism class.
"I definitely do feel journalism majors should take a course that just warns of the hazards and tells them what to do in these situations so that they should be better equipped so that a situation like this comes up," he said.
"And I think that if I was a reporter I would make it my point to help the safety and help educate against gun abuse in that way. Typically, guns don't kill people, people kill people, and that is true. The gun simply facilitates the act. My opinion on this is it's not so much a gun issue it's a cultural issue," he continued. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/28/2015)
|
The professor said, "I know for me it would not change my mind, she said."
My guess? The professor has a CCW. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|