
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
DC: The actual original intent of the Second Amendment
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I appreciated the Nov. 17 news article “Some common ground in contentious gun debate” and fully support any bipartisan attempt at gun regulation. But we will never find consensus so long as those who defy gun control believe that the Second Amendment is on their side. This falsehood is too often reinforced by the media. Responsible reporting on the Second Amendment and gun issues should recognize the debate is over its original intent and not promote that one-sided interpretation. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/23/2017)
|
Yet another libtard arguing the 2A was a collective right only intended for militia service. Like a vampire, this argument appears near impossible to kill off.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/23/2017)
|
Sheeeeyeah, right.
Founder after founder after founder expressed the understanding that the right to arms was individual, and unalienable.
Whence come these lying ninnies? |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/23/2017)
|
I don't know what country Walter is living in, but all I see are states and localities coming to their senses, one-by-one, eliminating (or severely relaxing) gun-free zones. Some are even removing permit requirements to carry in-state, and that movement is growing along with state after state coming to embrace Stand Your Ground self-defense laws.
The vast majority of states have reciprocity of some kind.
Hell, there's even a national reciprocity bill pending in Congress.
Walter should change his name to Cassandra.
Or open his eyes. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/23/2017)
|
Ignore my last: posted on wrong story. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|