|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/18/2018)
|
Patriot Prayer: "I-1639 is a totalitarian crackdown on our Second Amendment rights."
Snowflake students, covering their ears and running around in circles: "LALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALALAAAA" |
| Comment by:
-none-
(10/18/2018)
|
PP is thoroughly disowned by RNC. Medved and Ben Sasse were just talking about them and antifa as "reilly weird", highlighting to larger points which Sasse discusses in his book "Them: Why We Hate Each Other--and How to Heal", which discusses the polarization in age of social media, loneliness epidemic, propensity to take sides (D or R) to be on a team for this sense of community ("it doesn't work that way"), the 50% reduction of friends on average since 1990 amidst the general population, the trend toward robots as supposedly "viable" human replacements, etc.
"Win the battle, lose the war" seems the term of the day for both sides, to what end, what positive change do they seek, what can be accomplished by tit for tat assaults ?
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
