|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Proposal Would Allow Deadly Weapons in Missouri Capitol
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Parents of children who may be looking forward to a field trip to the Missouri Capitol in Jefferson City next year should be aware that, under a proposed new rule, individuals with concealed-carry permits would be allowed to bring firearms into the Capitol building. Thus, their children may be sharing hallways or visiting offices along with individuals carrying guns.
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(11/26/2018)
|
| Let's see now...All of these scary Concealed Handgun License holders have: "Passed" a criminal background check: Have "Never" been convicted of any drug offenses: Have "NO" felony convictions, but somehow, are still viewed as some kind of suspect. It's the criminals you have to worry about, not the law abiding. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
