|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gunfree Geo Marker: Is Turnabout Fair Play?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"'On Thursday morning, a handful of anti-gun-violence activists realized there is an app in the Google Play Store with their names on it—literally,' fastcompany.com reports. 'The app, Gunfree Geo Marker, features a map pinpointing the home and work addresses of politicians, gun control organization employees, and 'random anti-gun trolls' who ‘push the anti-gun agenda in any way, shape or form.' Clicking on a person’s name in the menu reveals their address on a Google map, along with the app creator’s reasons for including that person in the app.' The practice – known as 'doxing' – sounds an awful lot like harassment. But then . . ." ... |
Comment by:
-none-
(3/30/2015)
|
"For example, the gun’s owner may have insufficient training or a history of frequent and unlawful discharge. Gun Geo Marker’s makers say it is intended to be a safety tool" BS breakdown: 1. heresay speculation blacklisting 2. seriously, who has "frequent", and how few have UD? So infintesmal as to be unworthy of debate, especially in liberal areas mostly targeted (ex. chicago, milwaukee, madison). 3. safety? encouraging leftist (see: mass shooter stats) or criminal targeting of gun owners? ISIS just did the same thing with military members public info, but encouraged supporters (democrats/muslims/criminals) to kill/target them. - opposition doesn't have this question in their lexicon, "fair play" |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|