|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CO: Can you Follow Denver's Plan for the Red Flag Law?
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
That's what the state's new "Extreme Risk Protection Orders" law, commonly known as the red flag law, looks like on paper -- at least at the Denver city attorney's office. "This was a very complicated bill with a lot of nuances to it," said Marley Bordovsky, Director of the Prosecutions Section at the Denver City Attorney's Office. "It took a team of lawyers in the city attorney's office to map it out on a whiteboard to figure out the exact process, and this is what we came up with." |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/7/2020)
|
| Nothing more than criminal activity in attempting to undermine the 5th. and 14th. Amendments to the Constitution. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
