|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WA: Flurry of Gun Bills Submitted to Legislature
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A State Senate committee heard testimony on a number of gun-related bills Monday. KING 5 reports the Law and Justice Committee listened to testimony from a woman whose son was killed in the 2017 Freeman High School shooting. One bill would limit gun magazines to 10 rounds, which supporters say would keep a shooter from quickly reloading and save lives. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/23/2019)
|
These servants took an Oath of Office, and it's not like they don't know they are disregarding the constitution, and attempting to deprive law abiding citizens of their rights. We the people own this country. Not Congress or the Courts…Of the People, By the People, For the People…"
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
