|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Kamala Harris Propooses "Red Flag" to Take Guns From "Racists"
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Democratic presidential candidate and Sen. Kamala Harris (Calif.) has taken the concept of “red flag” gun confiscation laws a step further with a proposal to take guns away from white nationalists who might commit a hate crime. According to a policy proposal on her campaign website Wednesday, Harris said she would work to “combat and disarm violent hate” from white supremacists by pushing for legislation to give courts the ability to issue “Domestic Terrorism Prevention Orders” to take away the guns of “a suspected terrorist or individual who may imminently perpetrate a hate crime.”
|
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(8/19/2019)
|
| Do what has to be done to control criminals, but only up to the point of where you start depriving law abiding citizens of their Constitutional rights. Innocent until proven guilty, due process of law should not be skirted around in order to achieve the desired results. Honor the Oath of Office, and stay within the confines of the Constitution. These elected servants were givin the opportunity to "Serve," not "Rule" |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/19/2019)
|
Democrats consider all white conservatives to be racists.
By their definition, they can disarm half the population, and it won't be the half that is committing the crimes. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/19/2019)
|
You won't find this on the national news.
The gun grabbers would disarm law abiding citizens like this, leaving them vulnerable to thugs and criminals. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/19/2019)
|
| Sorry, above post is not for this article. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
