|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Person of interest identified in death of UT-Austin student
Submitted by:
jac
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Weiser’s remains were discovered Tuesday morning, and police revealed a timeline of her disappearance on Thursday.
She was seen leaving the drama building on campus bound for her dorm between 9:30 and 9:45 p.m. on Sunday night.
“She never made it to her dormitory that night,” Gay said.
Weiser’s roommates called university police the next day to report her missing and her body was found in a creek on campus Tuesday.
An autopsy concluded the death was a homicide and that she had been assaulted.
Submitters Note: And UT at Austin is doing everything they possibly can to restrict concealed carry by licensed individuals when it becomes law in August.
|
| Comment by:
mickey
(4/8/2016)
|
Even if the campus was carry friendly, an 18 year old wouldn't be lawfully carrying next fall.
And since the campus isn't carry friendly, a 21 year old isn't likely to be carrying on the way back to her dorm room. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
