|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The Day I Told My Father to Shoot Himself
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://inrigare.wordpress.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I stand sweating and anxious in a downtown Seattle courthouse. I am here to perform the frequently groaned about, but required responsibility as a citizen – jury duty. I am 32 and have reported for jury duty twice, but have never been called in for questioning. For this case, a high-profile gang-related shooting, every single person who showed up is questioned. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(4/26/2016)
|
So, Jennifer, you believe that you father was a violent abusive drunk because he owned guns???
Shut the F&$^ up about the rights of people who didn't do anything to you and get yourself a good counselor to help you understand why you want to hurt total strangers like me. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/26/2016)
|
Oh, MY!
'Scuse me while I wring out my hanky.... |
| Comment by:
jac
(4/26/2016)
|
| She sounds like she should be under the care of a psychiatrist. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(4/26/2016)
|
Assuming the author isn't honesty-challenged, she's not the only one in need of mental treatment.
They interrogated jurors on their opinions of the 2A before allowing them to hear a case about a street gang homicide? Why, because pro gun jurors are assumed to be pro murder jurors??? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
