|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/6/2018)
|
This 'law professor's' creds aren't worth the sheepskin they're printed on.
Legislative product, i.e. LAWS, are almost exclusively restrictions on liberty in one form or another. It is not now nor has it ever been in the legislative DNA to worry about protecting individual liberty - legislatures' natural bent is the expansion of government power. The Supreme Court exists precisely to rein in legislative excesses when they unconstitutionally burden fundamental rights and lower courts by rote defer to their acts as presumptively lawful.
Any law professor who doesn't know that (worse, refuses to accept it) should be bagging groceries instead. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. — Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States before the Adoption of the Constitution [Boston, 1833]. |
|
|
