|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Rubio Won’t Budge From Staunch Second Amendment Advocacy
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constitutionnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is facing down his Second Amendment critics who say the Republican is a do-nothing legislator on gun violence, stating Monday his legislative position provides him with a platform that others aren’t afforded. “I’m a U.S. senator; I can defend myself. But a lot of people can’t, and the message to them is: If you don’t agree, you need to be quiet or go away or we’ll turn on you too,” Rubio said. |
Comment by:
dasing
(3/28/2018)
|
Guns are NOT violent, so how can anyone do anything about "gun violence"???? |
Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(3/29/2018)
|
Parkland student David Hogg WANTS A BAN ON -AMONGST, WELL, EVERYTHING(!)... BUT SPECIFICALLY "LARGE-CAPACITY MAGs.
SURPRISE!! THE PARKLAND SKOOL SHOOTER DIDNT 'USE' LARGE-CAPACITY MAGS. HE USED 10rd. 'HUNTING' {sic} MAGs! SO RUBIO: WAKE UP MY MAN, and SMELL THE ROSES!! YA BEING BULLIED!! https://www.dailywire.com/news/27790/narrative-fail-florida-school-shooter-did-not-use-ryan-saavedra
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|