|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Reducing Information Asymmetry in the American Gun Market
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 7 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The mere presence of a gun in a home significantly increases all household members’ risk of a gun-related death due to suicide, homicide, or an accidental shooting. The purported benefits of defensive gun use do not offset the magnitude of this risk. A comprehensive analysis of 626 shootings occurring in three major U.S. cities found that for every time a gun was legally used to kill or injure for self-defense in the home, guns were also used for 11 attempted or completed suicides, seven homicides or criminal assaults, and four accidental shootings. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(11/15/2018)
|
| In the vast majority of defensive gun cases the presence of an armed victim causes the criminal to break off their attack. This latest counter intuitive reasoning by the anti gun folks claims a defensive firearm use doesn't count unless the attacker is killed or wounded. Studies by several government agencies including the FBI and CDC have found that firearms are used to defend citizens somewhere between 500,000 and three million times a year. The lower number is those that generate a police report while the higher is an estimate of actual events. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(11/15/2018)
|
| In the vast majority of defensive gun cases the presence of an armed victim causes the criminal to break off their attack. This latest counter intuitive reasoning by the anti gun folks claims a defensive firearm use doesn't count unless the attacker is killed or wounded. Studies by several government agencies including the FBI and CDC have found that firearms are used to defend citizens somewhere between 500,000 and three million times a year. The lower number is those that generate a police report while the higher is an estimate of actual events. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(11/15/2018)
|
| In the vast majority of defensive gun cases the presence of an armed victim causes the criminal to break off their attack. This latest counter intuitive reasoning by the anti gun folks claims a defensive firearm use doesn't count unless the attacker is killed or wounded. Studies by several government agencies including the FBI and CDC have found that firearms are used to defend citizens somewhere between 500,000 and three million times a year. The lower number is those that generate a police report while the higher is an estimate of actual events. |
| Comment by:
lbauer
(11/15/2018)
|
| In the vast majority of defensive gun cases the presence of an armed victim causes the criminal to break off their attack. This latest counter intuitive reasoning by the anti gun folks claims a defensive firearm use doesn't count unless the attacker is killed or wounded. Studies by several government agencies including the FBI and CDC have found that firearms are used to defend citizens somewhere between 500,000 and three million times a year. The lower number is those that generate a police report while the higher is an estimate of actual events. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/15/2018)
|
99% of defense uses of guns involve no shots fired, and there are a MINIMUM of 500,000 of these a year.
Liars use statistics but ignore the whole truth.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/15/2018)
|
"The purported benefits of defensive gun use do not offset the magnitude of this risk."
Actually, the benefits aren't 'purported', they're real. A more rational statement would be "The purported benefits of going gun-free do not surmount the need for a gun when one's life is threatened." |
| Comment by:
PP9
(11/15/2018)
|
In other news, wearing a parachute has been found to increase your risk of dying when skydiving. There are a certain number of fatalities each year in skydiving, and shockingly, every one of the victims was found to have been wearing a parachute!
So, if you are about to jump from a plane, make sure you are not wearing a parachute. They are killers! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
