data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdd48/fdd487ee41c9eeffc3a8053b937721c590360eee" alt="Keep and Bear Arms"
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Cortland County Town Says it won't Enforce Future State Gun Laws
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Cortland County town of Solon declared Thursday night that it will not enforce any new gun restrictions from New York state, the Cortland Standard reported. The board unanimously approved the “Town of Solon Second Amendment Preservation Act,” which declares any future state restrictions on guns or ammunition -- including any fees, regulations or background checks beyond what is already required -- violations of the Second Amendment and “null, void and of no effect."
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/9/2020)
|
All well and good, but what about the unconscionable SAFE Act already in place? This resolution merely says that anything beyond the SAFE Act will be moot, but the egregious damage of that act will be respected.
Political prestidigitation, of you ask ME. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|