
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PP9
(9/15/2023)
|
If someone cannot be trusted to have a gun, he cannot be trusted to be out in public, and should be in some kind of custodial care. It has to be assumed that everyone at large has access to pretty much anything they want to, within reason.
Hunter Biden is implicated, along with his crook of a father, in many crimes, but this particular one is the only one that doesn't also implicate slow Joe. Hunter is being sacrificed on this charge to protect Joe. The hope is that getting Hunter for this charge will whet the appetite of Joe's critics and get them to back off.
I am not all that concerned about getting Hunter. Without "the big guy," he's just a two bit criminal. It's "the big guy" that is the problem. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|