|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/22/2020)
|
"Removing to duty to retreat from our current self defense laws would create a wild west, I’ve even been told that by some people."
Really? REALLY? You've been TOLD that by some people?
First, you need to consider the politics and ideology of the people telling you that. Then, fact check to ascertain whether or not they're telling you the truth.
There is NO evidence of any "wild west" environs resulting from SYG laws. It is a hot-button term used to stoke people's fears and emotions.
In fact, any increase in homicides in states with SYG are mostly JUSTIFIED shootings.
But to anti-gun folks, there IS no justification for shooting someone, which is ironclad proof that they live in a fantasy bubble. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
