|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The NRA's sky-high drone hypocrisy
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But consider: What if a drone bears a weapon — as some police departments may some day soon, or as a do-it-yourselfer could rig up?
The government would surely say such a drone must be registered. And the NRA would likely counter that, well, no, a flying gun is still a gun, and therefore immune from regulation.
In fact, we here put the question to NRA chicken-hawk mouthpiece Wayne LaPierre: Do you agree that weaponized drones could be — should be — registered and regulated, if not banned? |
| Comment by:
laker1
(12/19/2015)
|
| So flying weapons should be registered. That should stop them from doing anything bad. You know, like car registration prevents drunk driving. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.— Benjamin Franklin Historical Review of Pennsylvania. [Note: This sentence was often quoted in the Revolutionary period. It occurs even so early as November, 1755, in an answer by the Assembly of Pennsylvania to the Governor, and forms the motto of Franklin's "Historical Review," 1759, appearing also in the body of the work. — Frothingham: Rise of the Republic of the United States, p. 413. ] |
|
|
