|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OR: Update - Photos / Structure Fire: Flames destroy local rifle barrel plant
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Harbor Fire intern Chief Thomas Sorrentino said the cause of the plant fire remains under investigation.
"Thirty-five years of my life went up in this fire,” Chris Dichter said.
Dichter is the owner of the Pac-Nor Barreling plant, at 99299 Overlook Road in Brookings and the adjacent 10 acre property. The plant manufactures precision rifle barrels.
Dichter made the comment as he watched flames rolling through the plant, which sits in a wooded area just east of Highway 101.
A heavy black and gray plume from the plant fire, Wednesday morning, Oct. 23, could be seen from the surrounding area.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/28/2019)
|
Personally, I blame the Wiccans.
[smirk] |
| Comment by:
jac
(10/28/2019)
|
| That is exactly what insurance is for. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
