|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NRA's Latest Call to Arms: Lawless Liberals Run Amok
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The influential lobbying and marketing arm for America’s gun manufacturers no longer has a Democrat in the White House to demonize as a way of boosting sales. A slump in demand since President Donald Trump’s inauguration seems to have prompted the National Rifle Association to manufacture a new demon: To arms! Lawless liberals are running amok! The newest NRA ad campaign is titled “Freedom’s Safest Place,” and it features incendiary narratives suggesting that taking up weapons is the only way to fend off a relentless onslaught on American values. This campaign is absurdly exaggerated but nevertheless frightening in its rationalization of guns as the solution to America’s political divide. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(7/10/2017)
|
| Slump in demand ? Better check the latest numbers, guns are still selling very well, thank you very much ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
