|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
lbauer
(5/12/2016)
|
Whenever a left wing politician says something politically embarrassing they either didn't understand the situation or misspoke. Sure.
No, Mrs Clinton, safe behind her squad of secret service bodyguards armed with automatic weapons never explicitly said she would abolish the Second Amendment. After the huge debacle of the 1994 assault weapon ban that was a dismal failure and caused great damage to democrats she wouldn't dare. But "common sense" gun control laws that slowly erode the rights of the little people are just fine with her. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/12/2016)
|
| She has stated support for the Australian gun confiscation .... so I would say that the claim she wants to "abolish the second amendment" are not far off the mark. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(5/12/2016)
|
Hilldebeest defended an adult paedophile rapist as his defense attorney, versus a girl and the audio of Hillarity's comments on the case is available. She cannot discern 'right and wrong'. She was the tactical team leader of her husband's "Bimbo Eruption Unit" and she destroyed the lives of the women Bill raped and fondled, most famously Monica Lewinsky. Against the law abiding, for the criminal, typical liberal.
gun saves abducted girl:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/12/tennessee-girl-allegedly-abducted-by-uncle-found-safe.html |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
