|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Countdown To November
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keeandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The conventions are over, and the candidates have spoken. Hillary Clinton, in her acceptance speech in Philadelphia, said she doesn’t want to repeal the Second Amendment or take anyone’s guns away—assertions she has made before and that we have addressed here. Still, she continues to push for further restrictions on gun ownership that won’t affect violent criminals, but only America’s law-abiding gun owners. Make no mistake about it, she does want to ban guns (it’s written in black and white in the party platform) and she is the anti-gun candidate in this race. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(8/2/2016)
|
Why repeal a Constitutional Amendment?
It's so much easier to just ignore it. |
| Comment by:
laker1
(8/2/2016)
|
| Just common sense gun control and keep them out of the wrong hands. Who are the wrong hands? We are the wrong hands but her armed guards are not. With Hillary, common sense is uncommon. We should believe her why? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
