|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Texas police officer's conduct at teen party raises concern, draws suspension
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The treatment of young pool party attendees in McKinney, Texas has led to the suspension of one of the responding officers after a video of the incident was published on YouTube.
The video, taken Friday, shows the officer forcing black juveniles in swimsuits to the ground. The incident occurred at a community pool in McKinney. The officer in the video has been suspended pending an investigation, according to a statement by the McKinney Police Department on Sunday morning, ABC affiliate WFAA TV reported.
|
| Comment by:
lostone1413
(6/8/2015)
|
| since we have made the police more like a military unit then law officers we see more and more unstable people on the police departments |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(6/8/2015)
|
Before being judgmental about a few minute's video of an officer's actions read this account :
"Full Story on the McKinney Pool Mob Fiasco" by Sundance
http://theconservativetreehouse.com
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
