|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Bloomberg Spending Millions To Elect Anti-Gun Virginia Governor
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Billionaire anti-gunner Michael Bloomberg is at it again, pledging to spend $1 million through his gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety in an attempt to impact Virginia’s upcoming elections for governor and attorney general. The $1 million consisted of $750,000 for Democrat gubernatorial candidate Ralph Northam and $250,000 for incumbent Attorney General Mark Herring, both of whom support more restrictive gun control laws for law-abiding Virginians. |
| Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(9/20/2017)
|
THESE SCUM POLITICIANS...
Thats all... Just SCUM Liberal-Socialists. STILL @ WORK trying to DISARM anyone they can!
----------
My VA. Friend says "Yeh, but whats wrong with 1gun a month limitation, man? heh. I mean.. How many guns u WANT every month? WOW. Know what I mean {as he chuckles}?"
* MY ANSWER: Yehhh, sure... 1 gun/month ... "COMMON-SENSE" Gun Reg's, right! {he agree's}. Except - Why not -later- 1 gun/every 3 mos.!! ... And then 2 guns/yr.! huh? Why NOT? Thats makes even 'MORE' COMMON SENSE - RIGHT?!!. LISTEN: Its called a 'slippery Slope' - lest we NEVER forget the SOCIALISTS' GOAL: *NO* GUNS a month! PERIOD! {he hung up} : )) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
