
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun Rights Group Criticized for Using Holocaust Pictures to Attack Rabbi
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://constituionnetwork.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A gun control organization levied criticism against a pro-gun group for suggesting that the Holocaust would not have happened if people had been armed. Oregon Firearms Federation (OFF) previously posted images of the Holocaust in response to an attempted ballot measure to ban certain firearms and magazines with more than a 10-round capacity. OFF, whose website says it is "Oregon's only no compromise gun rights organization," took aim at Rabbi Michael Cahana in its comments. |
Comment by:
hisself
(10/31/2018)
|
Obviously, they do not know of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising, where the Jews used guns liberated from Nazi soldiers to keep them at bay. Interesting tale of what happened when the Jews were armed. |
Comment by:
jac
(10/31/2018)
|
And Hitler disarmed the Jews to keep them from hurting themselves. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|