|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
LA: Bossier City man has manslaughter conviction overturned on appeal
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A Bossier City man who was sentenced to 39 years in prison for killing his friend and coworker has won his appeal and had his conviction reversed.
Patrick Harris, who had been convicted in the 2016 shooting death of Chris Flowers, has been freed following the ruling by the Louisiana state court of appeals.
Harris was represented in his appeal by attorney Jose Baez and The Baez Law Firm in Florida.
"He had several appealable issues,' Baez said. "But the biggest one was this was a very, very clear case of self-defense. All of the evidence pointed in the direction of self-defense.' |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(1/15/2021)
|
Exactly the kind of thing SYG is intended to prevent.
Harris shouldn't have been charged in the first place. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
