|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
What Does the Second Amendment Mean?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
It's one of the most controversial passages of the Constitution. Allegedly, it's also one of the most obscure and unintelligible sections. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads, "a well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." |
| Comment by:
laker1
(4/9/2016)
|
1. Keep-That means I own it and you can't have it.
2. Bare-means I have it right here on me and its loaded.
3.Militia-all able bodied 18 and over.
Thus its a civil, natural, and constitutional right. |
| Comment by:
jac
(4/10/2016)
|
Study some history and read the federalist papers. There is no ambiguity or unintelligibility in the meaning and intent of the second amendment.
Some people want to subvert the meaning of the second amendment to fit their self conceived agenda.
Just like the revisionists are teaching that the Japanese were already defeated and there was no reason to drop the atomic bombs. Study the history of 1945 and one will find that the Japanese were preparing to inflict heavy casualties on the US armed forces in the event an invasion was necessary. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(4/10/2016)
|
Why would the framers enumerate rights to individuals in all the 10 amendments of the BOR and yet some how exclude 2A as an individual right?
The debates during the constitutional convention were all about individual rights. Anything involving authorized govt action was referred to as 'powers". |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
