|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: Gun-buy waiting period doesn't infringe on anyone's rights
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Why, oh, why do the most rabid gun owners and wannabe gun buyers insist that common sense limitations on gun purchases, such as waiting periods and background checks, are infringements on their Second Amendment rights? Tomorrow, March 11, the Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety of the Wisconsin Senate will consider SB 35, a measure that would remove the 48-hour 'cooling-off' period for handgun sales in our state."
"The current law mandates a waiting period for handgun sales only, not those of any other armaments such as hunting rifles. It makes sense to me – and plenty of other folks who are working to prevent gun violence ... to prevent spontaneous gun purchases made in a fit of anger. ..." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(3/11/2015)
|
Unless, of course you're a female with a PFA being threatened or stalked. Or some small store owner being targeted by a local gang. Or witness prior to trial that just got the message "snitches get stitches". Lots of self-satisfied people living secure lives have no knowledge of the majority's realities.
But I'm willing to compromise. I suggest we apply the same restrictions to any commentator to purchase a computer, or publish a LTE. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
