
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
New poll conks Clinton: It’s a matter of trust
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In politics a week can be an eternity, and while these numbers may turn around, the slide Clinton has taken in the polls is cheering gun owners who know her views on gun control. They especially recall her remarks from one year ago that, “I believe that we need a more thoughtful conversation…We cannot let a minority of people—and that’s what it is, it is a minority of people—hold a viewpoint that terrorizes the majority of people.” |
Comment by:
jac
(6/3/2015)
|
I can't stand Hillary, but I want her to win the nomination. Every other Democratic candidate will be just as anti-gun as she, so as she is fond of saying, "What difference does it make?"
I believe that between the scandals already discovered and still to be found, that she will be the easiest Democratic candidate to defeat. Even the low information crowd will know that she is a devious untrustworthy self serving lier. (Of course that also describes the present resident of the white house.) |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|