|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Kinetic Concealment Now Offering Holsters for Ruger-57 Pistol
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Kinetic Concealment, maker of high-quality patented hybrid holsters, is proud to offer holsters to fit the popular Ruger-57 centerfire pistol.
Kinetic Concealment has created a perfect complement to the Ruger-57 with their Kydex shell hybrid holsters. Kinetic Concealment can now offer their original Hybrid IWB holster, KC Baby appendix carry holster, or OWB holster to fit the Ruger-57 for a complete self-defense package. The Ruger-57 is a semi-automatic chambered in 5.7x28mm and available with 20+1 capacity, or state-compliant 10+1 capacity. It’s a perfect option for hobby shooting, target practice, or even personal defense. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(6/26/2021)
|
| This could have been a great gun but ruger HAD to add some big obnoxious lever "safety" to it. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
