|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/6/2021)
|
The Supreme Court has already ruled that citizens have a fundamental right to bear arms in common use that are also suitable as militia weapons. Those are the specific characteristics required by the Supreme Court (U.S. v. Miller, D.C. v. Heller), and all firearms that meet that description are foreclosed from government restrictions.
These are not suggestions. They are the law of the land as to how Second Amendment protection is to be applied.
The attempt to define the 'preferred' violations of constitutional protections as "common sense gun safety laws" is immaterial. Fundamental rights are not subject to majority opinion or plebiscite; they are rights, not privileges, and are sacrosanct.
Get. That. Through. Your. Thick. Skulls. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|