|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Owning Guns Is Sort of Like Owning Rattlesnakes
Submitted by:
David Williamson
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
IN HIS SHORT story “Rattlesnakes and Men,” science fiction author Michael Bishop describes a town where everyone is required by law to own a dangerous rattlesnake. It’s a scenario that he says is no more absurd than how America treats access to guns. “We lost our son at Virginia Tech in 2007, in the shootings there,” Bishop says in Episode 322 of the Geek’s Guide to the Galaxy podcast. “I had been opposed to the laxity of our gun laws for a long, long time, and that just hardened both my wife and me on that particular point.” |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(8/20/2018)
|
I've been bit by a snake in my life ~~not a poisonous one. It was a living creature with a will of its own and survival instincts bred into its species by millions of years of surviving nature. I was a stupid kid playing with something I should have left alone.
I have never been bit by a gun .... that is an inanimate mechanical device. If I put it down it will stay there until I touch it again.
Try that with a Rattler or Cottonmouth. It won't be there when you come back .... and you might find out where it is in a remarkably painful way. |
| Comment by:
jac
(8/20/2018)
|
| It's difficult for me to accept that people are that stupid. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
