|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Studies Show...Wyoming Needs Its Guns
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The cowboy state needs its guns, this according to a new study showing state dependency on the gun industry. With the industry facing backlash in the wake of deadly shootings a Cheyenne gun shop owner told our Washington Bureau, he’s confident the industry is alive and well. Guns: The fiery topic of discussion across the country. In the wake of the high school shooting in Florida that left 17 dead calls for stricter gun laws, rang out across the nation.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/10/2018)
|
All of this 'debate' gives me heartburn.
There is only one thing that matters:
Keeping and bearing arms is a natural RIGHT.
Social policy cannot be allowed to enter into it.
"But the enshrinement of constitutional rights necessarily takes certain policy choices off the table." - D.C. v. Heller (2008) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
