|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(10/26/2021)
|
| Proof that gun confiscation does not stop crime AND more proof that the racist "FOID" law is racist. Most of these confiscations are probably for not having the unconstitutional "FOID" card and are probably against blacks. And since these confiscations help the manufacturers immensely, by removing product from the marketplace, that's why the nra never really fought the unconstitutional "FOID" law. NRA is a longtime deep state controlled entity that DOES NOT fight for liberty or the 2nd amendment reliably. It supported the lautenberg ban AND the current gun confiscation laden NDAA (until 3 days after the NDAA passed and it had to issue a statement appearing to oppose). |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(10/26/2021)
|
| Read the story, the ultra racist chicago powers (government and media) BRAG about how fast they can get to 10k gun confiscations (from blacks is what they MEAN). |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
