|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
PA: A modest proposal on guns
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Here is an example of a regulation that could provide an effective compromise. If individuals want to own semi-automatic assault weapons, either as collectors or for practice shooting, then enforce a provision that such weapons can only be kept at legally registered shooting ranges or other registered depositories, and cannot be removed from the designated premises.
Similarly, if individuals want to use unusual high-powered weapons for hunting, and if such weapons are deemed to be acceptable for hunting purposes, then require that the hunters collect their weapons from a registered hunting depot and redeposit them after hunting, with the guns and ammunition properly accounted for. |
| Comment by:
hisself
(10/17/2017)
|
You would deprive me of my God given right (ensured by the Second Amendment) to keep and bear arms, and you call it a 'modest proposal'?
|
| Comment by:
dasing
(10/17/2017)
|
| NEVER happen!!!! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/17/2017)
|
| I say we "deposit" the parts made of lead first!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| Comment by:
GR8dowbay
(10/18/2017)
|
THIS MORON HITS ON SO MANY ANTIQUATED, 'OUTDATED', 'OUTMODED', WORN-DOWN, LIB-SOCIALIST TALKING POINTS...
I WOULDNT EVEN KNOW WHERE TO START!! THE ENTIRE ARTICLE: TRIPE. GARBAGE. i.e. TOTALLY DISREGARD! NO RELEVANCE IN ANYTHING HE SAYS.
GLAD HE FOUND SOME DA##ED-GOOD WEED, THO! ...MORON.
---next. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
