|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Addled Clinton Confuses SCOTUS Decision With Gun Control Ad
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
What the District of Columbia was trying to do was to protect toddlers from guns. So they wanted people with guns to safely store them and the court didn’t accept that reasonable regulation. But they’ve accepted many others, so I see no conflict between saving people’s lives and defending the Second Amendment.
Um…what? Nowhere in the case are toddlers mentioned. She must be confusing an actual SCOTUS case with the Brady Campaign’s “Toddler’s Kill” ad.
In fact, the Heller decision struck down Washington, D.C.’s ban on handguns, saying it violated the Second Amendment rights of citizens to be able to own a functioning gun to protect their children in their own homes. |
| Comment by:
mzanghetti
(10/21/2016)
|
| Do not make the mistake of thinking Hillary was addled or confused about how she answered. Her answer was carefully crafted to confuse and conflate the ad and the issue. She is counting on the average under informed voter to have little to no knowledge of what the Heller actually held and to take her word for what the decision was about AND NOBODY TOLD THEM OTHERWISE. She counted on this happening! I would not ever make the mistake of thinking Hillary was ever just confused about anything, she counts on you doing this so she will be able to advance her agenda unopposed. You do so at your and the 2nd Amendments peril. |
| Comment by:
mzanghetti
(10/21/2016)
|
| Do not make the mistake of thinking Hillary was addled or confused about how she answered. Her answer was carefully crafted to confuse and conflate the ad and the issue. She is counting on the average under informed voter to have little to no knowledge of what the Heller actually held and to take her word for what the decision was about AND NOBODY TOLD THEM OTHERWISE. She counted on this happening! I would not ever make the mistake of thinking Hillary was ever just confused about anything, she counts on you doing this so she will be able to advance her agenda unopposed. You do so at your and the 2nd Amendments peril. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/21/2016)
|
| To paraphrase the (now daft) Glenn Beck, "She is a lying liar who lies." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
