
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
AFRet
(10/23/2017)
|
I think it's time the first amendment proponents got a taste of what licensing a constitutional right does to that right.
Now you turkeys will get a taste of what we in the second amendment community have had to put up with. Mostly BECAUSE of you!!!!! |
Comment by:
dasing
(10/23/2017)
|
1A and 2A are, BOTH, absolute rights, if your speech harms someone you are responsible for the actions produced by your speech, if you misuse a firearm you are responsible for the results, if you do neither, how can you be restricted... NOT according to our constitution !!! |
Comment by:
mickey
(10/23/2017)
|
The journalists and journalism professors universally agree, you're comparing apples to bowling balls, because, well, it's entirely different when you attack their rights! |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|