|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Senator: gun control discussions won't change 'neo-anarchist' Republican party
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 4 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Policy arguments about gun control will not change the votes of the “neo-anarchist” Republican party, a Democratic senator said on Friday.
Speaking at a New York University Law School conference on the second amendment, Connecticut senator Chris Murphy argued that the stalemate over guns will only end when conservatives find a new way of proving their anti-government credentials to voters.
“Democrats and Republicans – we aren’t just having different conversations about guns, we are on different planets,” Murphy said. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/9/2016)
|
"Democracy is not supposed to allow that to happen."???
Newsflash: The Bill of Rights exists PRECISELY to preclude that from happening.
Yet more proof that Democrats are ideological enemies of American First Principles. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(4/9/2016)
|
| Not on different planets just diffrent country's. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(4/10/2016)
|
| He's right about one thing. East coast democraps are on a different planet. |
| Comment by:
Uncommon1
(4/11/2016)
|
| The constitution in general, and the Bill of Rights, in particular, is as dead to the left as the Bible is to the atheists. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
