
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
Millwright66
(5/16/2015)
|
Seems there are a lot burglars in GA ! This 'statistic' seems more an indictment of GA's judiciary and penal system than a reflection on GA's firearms merchants or owners. OTOH, if GA is such a rich source of 'crime guns' why isn't ATF and the FBI moving into the fray ? Or does setting up 'sting ops' on middle-aged malcontents seem more appealing ? Or perhaps the current state of affairs is more congruent with the administration's anti-gun meme ?
|
Comment by:
shootergdv
(5/17/2015)
|
These stats are meaningless as they can only cite firearms that are traceable(or those they choose to trace). Hopefully there will always be millions Big Brother doesn't know about. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|