|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
20 million birds and other animals die annually after ingesting lead left behind by hunters
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In March, conservationists cried foul when new U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke overturned an Obama-administration ban on using lead ammunition or fishing tackle on federal lands. Lead is toxic to the neurological systems of animals that ingest it, killing millions each year. Though lead's poisonous effects on wildlife have been known for more than a century, eliminating it from nature continues to be an uphill battle.
Mark Pokras, V84, an associate professor emeritus of infectious disease and global health at Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, conducted research on lead poisoning in loons that led to several state bans on lead fishing tackle. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(5/26/2017)
|
| Maybe a bird could pick up shotgun pellets and store it in his crop with long term damage resulting from it, but no mammal ever died from swallowing lumps of lead and pooping them out. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(5/26/2017)
|
Who counted all the dead birds? How do they know they died of lead ingestion --- were they ALL necropsied?
Really.....this stinks. It smells of bird poop. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/26/2017)
|
Shut up and go away.
Man hath dominion over all the Earth, and all the creatures therein. Thus saith the LAWerd!
Translation: We can do whatever we want, and they can either deal with it, or not. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
