|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WA: Proposed Alternative To NRA's 'Murder Insurance' Has Early Support
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
But Chris Thobaben, a Marine Corps officer and 2020 candidate for Washington state representative, said he has a better idea.
Thobaben proposes requiring gun owners to make a one-time payment at the point of purchase. That payment would be for an insurance policy that would stay attached to the gun for its lifespan, even if it’s sold.
“So if gun No. 11567 is used to kill John Smith, John Smith’s family is subject to receive the payout of John Smith’s life value,” Thobaben explained.
The policy upends the traditional insurance model. It doesn’t cover the shooter, only the victim of gun violence.
And Thobaben’s plan might catch on.
He said his proposal has support from the gun control group Moms Demand Action and the NRA. |
| Comment by:
jac
(1/19/2019)
|
Stupid idea.
You are going to reward a criminal who gets shot with a payout to his family?
All this will do is increase the cost of buying a gun by hundreds of dollars. The insurance on some guns will exceed the value of the gun itself. |
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/19/2019)
|
| Charged a "Payment" by the State, to exercise a Freedom guaranteed by the Federal Constitution? Rights are "Not Privileges”, and are "NOT" lawfully subject to "One Time Payment" to do so. Rights are not voted on, or charged for. Law abiding citizens refuse to take responsibility for the actions of criminals. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
