|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AR: Won't Apologize for 'Passion and Emotion,' Flowers Says; Senators Against Reprimand
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Arkansas Sen. Stephanie Flowers, D-Pine Bluff, on Monday told lawmakers that she won't apologize for a passionate argument she made against a "stand your ground" self-defense bill last week. Her remarks came after video of the speech went viral over the weekend. A clip of Flowers chastising a Senate Judiciary Committee and refusing to stop speaking was viewed millions of times online and shared by politicians, gun control advocates and celebrities. In the video, Flowers argues that "stand your ground" laws in other states have taken a violent toll on black communities.
|
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/12/2019)
|
Politicians like Flowers don't need to apologize, they don't need to be reprimanded ....
THEY NEED TO BE TURNED OUT OF OFFICE!!!!!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
