|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Is Being Anti-Open Carry Anti-Second Amendment?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I got a message this morning from a Missouri man who describes himself as a former reader of our Facebook page.
Have had enough of your anti open carry nonsense. Might want to look into renaming the page, as it’s currently falsely advertised. You just lost a ‘Like.’
Sigh.
Ed.: Yes, being anti-open carry is anti-Second Amendment. You cannot argue against exercising the fundamental right protected by the 2A and still be 'pro 2A'. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/13/2016)
|
Bob Owens supports the right of people like Bob Owens to bear guns the way Bob Owens wants to bear them.
That does not make him any more pro-gun than, for example, Kim Kardashian or Space Cadet Mark Kelly. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. — James Madison, The Federalist Papers, No. 46 |
|
|
