|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: From the ‘Battle of North Hollywood’ to Sutherland Springs, a gun reality check
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
America needs meaningful, sweeping and immediate federal action on guns.
1) No semi-automatic weapons of any kind, rifle, pistol or shotgun.
2) Bolt-action rifles only, with a minimum barrel length of 20-inches, and a maximum 4-round capacity (one round in the chamber, three rounds in the magazine).
3) Only the sale of over-and-under or side-by-side shotguns with a minimum barrel length of 20-inches would be legal (limiting the shooter to 2-rounds before reloading). No pump-action or semi-automatic shotguns; no pistol-grips or collapsible stocks.
4) Revolvers would be the only legal handguns, with 6-round cylinder maximum capacity and a 6-inch barrel length minimum.
Ed.: List continues. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(11/10/2017)
|
| Gun banners want you dead!! |
| Comment by:
dasing
(11/10/2017)
|
| The general public does not have military grade weapons!!!!!! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
