|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SAF Sues Over Michigan Agency’s Gun Regulations for Foster Parents
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a lawsuit in federal district court in Michigan, challenging that state’s regulations on firearms ownership and use for anyone seeking to become a foster parent. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan against Nick Lyon “in his official capacity as director of the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS). It alleges that the agency has violated the civil rights of four people under color of law.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/18/2017)
|
Let me get this straight: The judge says that he knows that the court is violating constitutional rights, but is upholding the illegal mandate regardless?
WTF is THAT? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
