|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
NotPrey
(6/15/2016)
|
| It is obvious that Bill O'Reilly does not know anything about hunting rifles and the power of various cartridges. I am disappointed that Bill O'Reilly sunk to a mindless knee jerk emotional response about the so called "assault weapon" |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/15/2016)
|
Actually, the AR-15 platform is not a high powered rifle. It is a medium power rifle at best.
Anyone that believes restrictions on firearms will deter terrorists, criminals, and malcontents is living a fantasy. The terrorists in France had full automatic rifles and grenades in a county where all guns are tightly controlled. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/15/2016)
|
Everytime O'Reilly talks about what guns should be regulated, he says we ought not be able to buy bazooka and handgrenades.
*Sigh*
Bazooka are obsolete. And where can I buy grenades? I have never seen any of those....ever....being sold at gun shows or Gunstores.
Do they have "grenade shows?"
What am I missing? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
