|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
packing in va
(3/7/2019)
|
| So it is better that people be shot by the twos and threes in cities like Chicago? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(3/7/2019)
|
Seems to me most "mass shootings" are done with guns the perp already owns, so I doubt gun control laws of any type would help.
I think this study is rigged. |
| Comment by:
jac
(3/7/2019)
|
We would have fewer mass shootings if we got rid of victim disarmament zones.
That won't happen because the gun control liberals want more mass shootings to further their agenda of imposing more restrictions on law abiding gun owners. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
